Hewitt Capital

I revived a miss call that led to a voice mail telling me I needed to contact this law firm before they file a lawsuit against me and garnish my wages. I called and spoke to a woman named Conrad she told me she was a law firm attempting to collect $132 debt. That I committed fraud against the original debitor and if I didn’t make payments arrangements with her. Her law firm will be filing a suit in my county to garnish my wages. That I would be paying $900.00 for Attorny fees. I told her she was a debit collector and she was impersonating a law firm. She never stated she was a debt collector. When i called the main office for the address to make a complaint he gave me the wrong address do not use this company!!!! Make complaints to the CFPB or FTC

The FDCPA broadly prohibits a debt collector from using ‘any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.’ 15 U.S.C. § 1692e.” Dunlap v. Credit Protection ***** n, L.P., 419 F.3d 1011, 1012 (9th Cir. 2005). The statute enumerates several examples of such practices, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e, as well as several examples of unfair practices, 15 U.S.C. § 1692f. The FDCPA also provides, for example, that debt collectors may not harass or annoy debtors, may not threaten debtors with arrest, and may not threaten legal action unless litigation actually is being contemplated. See 15 U.S.C. §1692d. § 807. False or misleading representations A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: (1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof. (2) The false representation of -- (A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt;